Friday 7 February 2020

Get Know About Halala After Khula Procedure in Pakistan

Re-Union after Khula in Pakistan:

Dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula in Pakistan is right of wife. Re- union after khula in Pakistan is also possible. Review of the judgment by High Court, application for. Suit filed by the plaintiff for dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula in Pakistan was decreed by the Family Court. Defendant challenged judgment and decree of the Family Court in Constitutional petition, which petition having been dismissed by the High Court; the defendant had filed application for review of the judgment and decree on the ground that parties had decided for re-union. Plaintiff on whose request marriage was dissolved on the ground of Khula, conceded the request of defendant and stated that parties had settled of their dispute and decided of Khula'.

Some Condition of Khula Which known as “Talaq-ul-Ba’ayen”:

Pronouncement of Khula' by the Court was a single divorce, as the defendant husband never accepted it voluntarily. Such kind of dissolution of marriage was known as "Talaq-ul-Ba'ayen Before re-union in such-like cases Halala in Pakistan was neither condition precedent nor the decree of Khula' was a hurdle in the way of re-union. No provision of law precluded the spouses from re-union, however, only condition was to perform a fresh Nikah. Since re-union of the parties after decree of Khula was a result of a fresh contract, the judgment and decree had no restraining effect upon remarrying. Review of the judgments and decrees was not needed in circumstances. When the judgments and decrees attained finality, same would automatically become operative. Marriage having been dissolved, the judgments and decrees had become past and closed transactions. Once the judgment and decree had been implemented, those would not remain in field. No question of review thus would arise, in circumstances.



How to do Halala in Pakistan?

Remarriage with same husband would be subject to the performance of another Nikah. Section 7(6) of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 allows such reunion without Halala in Pakistan and there is no restraint either in the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 or the Injunctions of Quran and Sunnah not to allow the prayer of the husband for reunion with his wife when she is ready to live again as his wife within the limits of God Couple, in the present case, has lived apart for the last 11 years on account of the dissolution of their marriage through a decree, they have an easy option and can annul the legal effect of the decree in question by solemnizing another marriage as there is no physical, moral or legal obstacle in their way to do so and Such is the only legal course open to them.  3 Reunion between spouses was not possible.

After Khula about Halala?

Dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula is a single divorce. Conscience of Judge Family Court satisfied that reunion between spouses was not possible and that they could not live together. Held, Khula decree was unexceptionable and did not merit interference in writ jurisdiction. The law previous to the enforcement of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 made it obligatory for couples divorced by any mode of "Talaq" other than Talaq-i-Ahsan not to remarry of both again until the wife marries another person by a contract legally valid and then afterwards dies or divorces her after having sexual intercourse and she marries her 1st husband after the period of lddat. Before re-marriage, the parties had to prove that the bar to their marriage was removed by an intermediate marriage, consummation and dissolution, otherwise their marriage was not considered valid. In the case of divorce through Khula it is not obligatory on the wife to re-marry a third person before entering into re-marriage tie with her first husband.

Thursday 6 February 2020

Get Professional Lawyer for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan


Law for Suit for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Principles of res judicata restraining wife from approaching the Family Court for suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan on the ground of Khula does not apply. Contention of husband was that on the basis of such condition, the wife could not seek dissolution of marriage in Pakistan on basis of Khula. Condition in marriage certificate, for the Family Court dissolution of the marriage in Pakistan and that earlier suit for dissolution of marriage was withdrawn; therefore, principles of res judicata were applicable in the suit. Family Court had rightly found the condition in marriage certificate restraining the wife from approaching Court for divorce on the ground of Khula' was not legal condition which could not prevent the wife from seeking dissolution of marriage in Pakistan on the ground of Khula from the competent Court. Family Court also rightly found that in view of evidence on record it was not possible between the parties to live together within the limits of Allah.



Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan on the base of Khula:

Findings of the Family Court were affirmed of by the High Court. No misreading or non-reading of by evidence was pointed out by the husband. Subsequent suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan on the ground of Khula' was not barred ass in such cases recurring cause of action could accrue to the party. All the Courts below had given Concurrent finding with regard to the right of wife for seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of Khula'. Leave to appeal was refused. Suit for dissolution of marriage on basis of Khula filed through attorney/mother. Appearance of plaintiff in pre-trial conciliation proceedings through her attorney was valid. Suit decreed by Family Court on failure of conciliation efforts upheld by Appellate Court. Party could not be deprived of his right to appear and defend suit through his/her attorney as such representation was permitted and Bar recognized by S. 22 of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973 and S. 18 of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964.

Legal Act for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan in West Pakistan:

Right of a pardanashin lady under Section 18 of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 to appear through a duly authorized agent applicable to a person in general would apply to a party to suit also. Presence of parties in person in pre-trial conciliation proceedings was not obligatory, thus, their non-presence in person would not vitiate proceedings. Defendant, in the present case himself had not participated in such proceedings, thus, he could not object to appearance of plaintiff through her attorney. High Court dismissed Constitutional petition. According to S. 83, C.P.C., even an alien, if not falling within definition of an alien enemy, could sue in Pakistan, Residence of one party or accrual of cause of action wholly or in part within local limits of a Family Court in Pakistan would give the Court jurisdiction to entertain such suit.



More about Some Important Laws:

Failure of pre-trial conciliation efforts failed and permanent resident of State of Azad Jammu and Kashmir could result in judicial divorce. Husband's application seeking dismissal of suit by Family Court in Pakistan for lacking jurisdiction to try, same as parties were citizens of State of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Dismissal of such application and passing of decree for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan by Family Court for failure of pre- trial conciliation efforts was valid. According to S. 14(b) of Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951, a permanent resident of State of Azad Jammu and Kashmir having migrated to Pakistan would be regarded as citizen of Pakistan. Subjects of the State holding Pakistani passports would be deemed to be citizens of Pakistan. Section 83 CPC provided that an alien, if not falling within definition of an "alien" enemy, could sue in Pakistan in case of divorce.

Tuesday 4 February 2020

Professional Lawyer for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan


Legal Solution for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Dissolution of marriage in Pakistan on ground of Khula is acceptable. Repeated statement by wife in her pleadings, her testimony and her statement at the bar that she was not prepared to live with her husband would be enough proof of her determined aversion against her husband justifying Khula in Pakistan. Denial of Khula in Pakistan decree in such case would serve no purpose as by such denial and allowing decree for restitution of conjugal rights, she cannot be compelled to go back to her husband and have harmonious matrimonial life. Held, in present case that preponderance of evidence was weighty in favor of wife's claim for Khula in Pakistan and lower Courts erroneously rejected it. Disparity of ages in a case where wife is less than 18 years and husband is more than 40 years of age, can be treated as hatred justifying dissolution of marriage in Pakistan on grounds of Khula.




Judgment of Family Court for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Decree of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan passed by Family Court on ground of Khula in view of disparity of ages was valid. It was upheld by High Court with finding that circumstances of case did not call for exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dissolution of marriage in Pakistan through ground of Khula was right of female. Dissolution of marriage in Pakistan through ground of Khula, ordered by High Court in writ jurisdiction was upheld. Husband seeking leave to appeal to Supreme Court against judgment of High Court with contention that High Court judgment was not sustainable as no direction for return of monetary benefits by wife to husband had been made in favor of husband. Held, Husband had not insisted upon at proper stage for determination of exact benefits received by wife nor for their return and as such no relief could be given to him by High Court in its writ jurisdiction with result that High Court judgment was unexceptionable.

More about Law for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Judgment of Family Court impugned in writ jurisdiction with contention that term of Khula had not been examined in Dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula was in accordance with law. Held, in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in NLR 1983 Civil S.C. 305, impugned judgment did not suffer from a vitiative factual or legal infirmity. Evidence clearly showing that wife was not ready to live. Evidence clearly showing that wife was not ready to live with husband. Held, decree of Family Judge dissolving marriage by way of Khula was not liable to interference in writ jurisdiction. 46. For allowing wife authority to exercise right of Khula'. For allowing wife authority to exercise right of Khula', reasonable proof held, must exist, sufficient for satisfaction Court showing incompatibility of temperament indicating total lack of sympathy, between of husband and wife, resulting in resistance to mutual adoption, Qur'an Sura Baqr, Verse 229.




Dissolution of Marriage via Khula:

Dissolution of marriage on plea of Khula', would be available only, if Conscious attempt was made by wife to exercise such right in this behalf and not otherwise. Unless wife comes forward to specifically claim right of Khula' decree could not be allowed merely on Court's motion. Wife is entitled to dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula. Court must pass Khula decree if wife satisfies conscience of Court that it would otherwise mean forcing her into a hateful union. Wife with resolute firmness in irretrievable terms ruling out possibility of living with husband as spouse was upheld. Held, dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula in Pakistan such case would be unexceptionable.

Visit for more information:


<a href="https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/02/best-lawyer-for-dissolution-of-marriage.html"> https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/02/best-lawyer-for-dissolution-of-marriage.html </a>
<a href="https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/02/professional-lawyer-for-suit-for.html"> https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/02/professional-lawyer-for-suit-for.html </a>
<a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/micheljason879/comments/ey69fk/get_expert_lawyer_for_khula_in_pakistan/l"> https://www.reddit.com/user/micheljason879/comments/ey69fk/get_expert_lawyer_for_khula_in_pakistan/ </a>
<a href="https://professionallawyers11.blogspot.com/2020/01/legal-procedure-of-khula-in-pakistan.html"> https://professionallawyers11.blogspot.com/2020/01/legal-procedure-of-khula-in-pakistan.html </a><a href="https://blog.storymirror.com/read/evr2rbi6/get-dissolution-of-marriage-with-professional-lawyer-advocate-nazia"> https://blog.storymirror.com/read/evr2rbi6/get-dissolution-of-marriage-with-professional-lawyer-advocate-nazia </a>

Monday 3 February 2020

Professional Lawyer For Suit For Declaration in Pakistan By Pakistani Law


Suit for Declaration in Pakistan with Permanent Injunction:

Suit for declaration in Pakistan with permanent injunction was heard by the court. Contract document of settlement of dower was prepared. Suit for declaration in Pakistan with permanent injunction praying that plaintiff be declared owner of the property in question in terms of contract (document of settlement of dower). Defendants moved application under Order VII, Rule 10, C.P.C., contending that subject-matter of the suit being recovery of dower, which fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court; therefore, Civil Court had no jurisdiction to hear the suit. Held, under S. 5 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, Family Court enjoyed exclusive jurisdiction to try matters enumerated in the First Schedule and dower being an item mentioned in the Schedule, the exclusive jurisdiction to entertain the suit for declaration in Pakistan with permanent injunction was with Family Court. Jurisdiction vested in Courts under special law i.e., West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 Ousted the plenary jurisdiction of Civil Courts.

According to Law of Pakistan:

Said jurisdictional boundaries had to be maintained and any proceedings before a forum lacking jurisdiction could not be permitted to continue, therefore proceedings before the Civil Court were coram non judice and void. Application of defendant, under Order VII, Rule 10, C.P.C., was allowed and plaint was returned to the plaintiff to file the same before Family Court of competent jurisdiction. High Court observed that it was painful to note that the suit of the plaintiff was filed in the year, 2004 and it was now being returned for lack of jurisdiction in the year 2011 after almost seven years; had the Civil Court examined the plaint judiciously and diligently parties could have been put on proper course seven years ago. Jurisdiction vested in Family Court. Jurisdiction vested in Family Court is determined on the basis of subject-matter and not on the basis of persons, permitted or entitled to invoke such jurisdiction.



West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964:

No provision was available in West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, which Classifies or in any way limits category of persons entitled to be a part to proceedings before Family Court. Proceedings before Family Court were valid. Non applicability of provisions of C.P.C., to such proceedings was relevant. Family Court could adopt procedure of its choice in order to meet situation not visualized in West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. Provisions of C.P.C., were not applicable in proceedings under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 in case of suit for declaration in Pakistan with permanent injunction. Provisions of C.P.C., were not applicable in proceedings under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964 and the latter excluded.

More about Law for Suit for Declaration in Pakistan:

The application of general provisions of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 before Family Court, for progress of the cases, had to regulate its own proceedings as West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 was deficient to cover each and every conceivable eventuality. Family Court in such a situation could adopt the procedure in the civil procedure Code, 1908 and as such the procedure adopted by the Family Court itself could not be questioned. Proviso to Section 10(4) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 was alleged to be violations of Injunctions of Islam. Petitioner could raise such plea before Federal Islam Court and not before the High Court. High Court dismissed Constitutional petition in circumstances.

For more information Visit:


https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/02/best-lawyer-for-dissolution-of-marriage.html
https://runkit.com/aleygill324/how-to-solve-suit-of-declaration-in-pakistan
https://runkit.com/aleygill324/get-best-lawyer-consultancy-about-maintenance-of-wife-in-pakistan
https://runkit.com/aleygill324/suit-for-dissolution-of-marriage-in-pakistan-advocate-nazia
https://www.reddit.com/user/aleyjoson689/comments/ewojgh/best_lawyer_in_lahore_pakistan_aazad_law/
https://diggo.wikitechguru.com/2020/01/31/get-professional-lawyer-in-lahore-for-legal-cases/
https://news.wikitechguru.com/2020/01/31/solve-you-legal-cases-with-expert-lawyer-in-lahore-pakistan-2/

Best Lawyer For Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan


Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Dissolution of marriage in Pakistan by husband in form of khula in Pakistan or mubarat is valid.  Notice of dissolution ofmarriage in Pakistan to Chairman is essential. Contention that in case of dissolution of marriage by husband in form of khula/mubarat, proceedings would not be necessary Escaping the liability of damages as mentioned in Column No. 19 of Nikahnama onus to prove was on husband in case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan. Right of divorce in Pakistan was exercised by husband. Wife claimed damages on the account that she was divorced without any reason or ground and was entitled to damages as were mentioned in Column No. 18 of Nikahnama. Family Court dismissed the suit but Appellate Court allowed the appeal and the suit was decreed in favor of the wife Validity.
The only reason that the husband divorced his wife that he wanted to avoid the amount of damages as specified in the nikahnama. Appellate Court had rightly held the husband able under the condition contained in Column No. 18 of Nikahnama. Revision jurisdiction was directed against irregular exercise, exercise or illegal assumption of jurisdiction and not against conclusion of fact or law, not involving question of jurisdiction. Judgment passed by Appellate Court was reasonable, conclusions-drawn were based on evidence and were supported by plausible reasoning and did not suffer from any jurisdictional infirmity, High Court in exercise of revision Jurisdiction declined to interfere with the judgment passed by Appellate Court in favour of the wife. Revision was dismissed after the dissolution of marriage in Pakistan.

Maintenance in Some Specific Condition:

Award of maintenance by Arbitration Council as ordered by District Collector for period when marriage was subsisting. Husband had divorced in Pakistan to wile on 28.1.1991 when she was pregnant and proceedings before Arbitration Council remained pending till 6.8.1992 although child was born to wife in August, 1991 and divorce pronounced by husband had become effective in August, 1991. Divorce in Pakistan having become effective on the delivery of child. Period of maintenance was to be counted from 28.1.1991 till August, 1991. Decree of maintenance was however, modified by High Court as the original decree was based on miscalculation in the case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan.

Question of Legality of Divorce in Pakistan:

Chairman cannot decide question of legality of divorce in Pakistan said to have been pronounced by husband nor can he issue question divorce certificate in Pakistan. Proceedings u/s. 7 is primarily designed towards bringing about reconciliation between Spouses. With death of husband after communication of divorce notice to Chairman the question of reconciliation would not arise. Proceedings before Chairman even if pending would stand frustrated in case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan.

More about This Processes:

Petitioner wife did not make any step to challenge order of Chairman Union Committee ordering divorce in Pakistan to become effective and order of Chairman became final, Petitioner agitated the matter in Constitutional petition after a period of six years. Order of Chairman, held, could not be allowed to be challenged after such a long time. Cases wherein transactions had become past and closed due to efflux of time could not be reopened. Finality had to two Adult males to hear said the divorce in Pakistan and the case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan was decided.

For more information Visit:


https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/01/legal-way-to-solve-cases-of-suit-of.html
https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/01/let-know-about-law-for-suit-of.html
https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/02/get-know-easy-way-to-get-divorce-in.html
https://professionallawyers11.blogspot.com/2020/01/suit-of-declaration-in-pakistan-for.html
https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/01/top-female-lawyer-for-suit-of-conjugal.html
https://suitoflegallaw.blogspot.com/2020/01/lawyer-who-knows-latest-procedure-for.html
https://social.wikitechguru.com/2020/01/31/one-of-the-top-lawyer-in-lahore-pakistan-with-best-law-service/
https://bookmark.wikitechguru.com/2020/01/31/professional-lawyer-providing-best-service-for-law-firm-in-lahore/

Saturday 1 February 2020

Get Know Easy Way To Get Divorce in Pakistan By Professional Lawyer


How to Pakistani Husband Have Approach To Get Divorce in Abroad:

High Court directed that husband should approach the Pakistan Mission in the country (abroad) to register the divorce in Pakistan pronounced by him upon the wife and for reconciliation proceedings visualized under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 to be undertaken there. Proceedings before Chairman Union Council for divorce in Pakistan, in circumstances, were declared to be incompetent. Failure of reconciliation attempts effect divorce in Pakistan. Apart from recorded material and failing of two attempts at reconciliation in Courts below, question answer meeting with respondent in Court sufficiently reinforced Court's impression that damage already done was beyond repair i.e. no prospects in the offing for a happy restoration of relations between estranged spouses.



High Court Orders About Divorce in Pakistan from Abroad:

To separate spouses would be better than to force them to live in an atmosphere perpetually surcharged with mutual distract and hatred towards each other, where circumstances so warranted. Marriage bereft of its attendant bliss served no useful purpose; rather such atmosphere would negate and in defeat its purpose. Even considerable passage of time since commencement of action of Court could not heal wounds and bridge existing differences. Time had in fact widened the gap. Marriage between spouses in such state of human affairs seemed to have broken down. Lower Appellate Courts, although did not properly read record in regard to second marriage of husband yet Court's conclusions on overall view of existing circumstances were not faulty. No reliable evidence was produced on record in support of benefits to be returned for grant of Khula in Pakistan divorce, nor was such claim laid in written statement. Despite some defects in impugned judgment occasioned by incorrect, reading of record, yet upon a careful review and overall analysis of all the circumstances of case, no interference in equitable jurisdiction of Court was called for.

About Law of Divorce and Khula Procedure in Pakistan:

Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. Post trial reconciliation. From evidence it appears that respondent No. 1 was not prepared to rejoin petitioner. She expressed her unequivocal determined disinclination for petitioner. Held, efforts for reconciliation at post trial stage would have been a mere formality. Post trial efforts for reconciliation, Court's failure to make. Wife seeking dissolution of marriage on the basis of khula in Pakistan had expressed in her evidence unequivocal determined disinclination for her husband and was not prepared to rejoin him.


Some Rules of Trial Court for Divorce and Khula in Pakistan:

Children who could otherwise have served as a uniting factor also did not succeed to bring spouses together. Court after close of evidence had not made efforts for reconciliation between parties. Held, it was mere irregularity on part of Trial Court which could not effect decision of Court on merits. 9 Judge Family Court decreeing Khula divorce-No efforts having been made for Compromise reconciliation. Petitioner assailing the same through Constitutional petition thereby contending that the Trial Court had not justifiably closed his evidence. No efforts having been made for compromise or reconciliation. Further the existing evidence not justifying the grant of Khula divorce. It was held that there was no substance in such contentions, further held that provisions in the Family Courts Act aimed at quick settlement of family disputes. The judgment which proceeded on correct analysis of the evidence since suffered from no misapplication of law there was no reason to interfere therewith. 1. Suit for dissolution of marriage. Suit for dissolution of marriage, recovery of dower and dowry articles was decided. Pre-trial re-conciliation proceedings failed, suit for dissolution of marriage was decreed on ground of Khula in Pakistan. Direction to return of five tolas gold in lieu of Khula in Pakistan was upheld.


Follow for more information:
http://www.24article.com/legal-way-of-dissolution-of-marriage-in-pakistan-advocate-nazia.html
https://runkit.com/jameswilson789/one-of-top-lawyer-to-solve-case-of-suit-of-declaration-in-pakistan-by-law
https://runkit.com/wilsonclark34/get-professional-lawyer-for-procedure-of-divorce-in-pakistan

Friday 31 January 2020

Let Know About Law For Suit of Dissolution in Pakistan By Professional Lawyer


Let know about Suit of Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Ex-husband having knowledge of pendency of proceeding for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan deliberately avoiding his appearance. Lady already contracting second marriage and living with her second husband, the ex-husband failing to substantiate his non-service in the suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan, Supreme Court declined to interfere. Time taken by defendant in making application for setting aside ex parte decree was granted. Rule-making authority having reasonableness of time taken by defendant in making application for setting aside ex parte decree, Rule 13 of West Pakistan Family Courts Rules restricting period of limitation to 30 days to be ultra vires of sub-section (6) of S. 9 of Act.2 3. Dissolution of marriage in Pakistan ex parte decree was granted by Family Court.

Application for Dissolution of Marriage:

Suit filed by wife for dissolution of marriage ex parte decree granted by Family Court. Husband's application for setting aside ex parte decree dismissed on ground that wife had contracted second marriage after ex parte decree. Husband invoked writ jurisdiction of High Court challenging order. Order of Family Court dismissing husband's application set aside. Held, contracting of a second marriage by wife soon after obtaining ex parte decree could hardly be treated a valid ground for throwing out husband's application for setting aside ex parte decree. Husband's application ought to have been decided after holding an inquiry into question whether he had sufficient reason for not appearing in Family Court to contest dissolution of marriage in Pakistan. Ex parte decree of dissolution of marriage passed. Ex parte decree of dissolution of marriage passed but was set aside by Family Court on being satisfied by husband that service was not duly affected. Order of Family Court setting aside ex parte decree was reversed in appeal by District Judge.


Trial Court Orders for That Condition:

After order of Trial Court reopening case Held: Setting aside ex parte decree does not amount to "decision" hence not appealable. Order of Appellate Court reversing that of trial Court quashed in exercise of writ jurisdiction as District Judge had passed order in appeal without lawful authority. Ex parte decree on the basis of invalid service was found. Family Court without having substituted service merely acting on suo motu report of process-server and passing ex parte decree, the way adopted by the Court held invalid and against mandatory requirement of law.

About Law for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Ex parte decree being result of invalid service set aside by the High Court in constitutional jurisdiction adopted recourse to a bald observation that application is dismissed because ex parte order had already been passed would negate provision of S. 9(5) (a). Defendant has a right at or before adjourned hearing to appear and assign good cause for his non-appearance. In case he assigns good cause for his previous non-appearance the Family Court has to hear him in answer to the suit as if he had appeared on a day fixed for his appearance. This would be subject to such terms as Family Court may direct but essentially such terms would not be meant to take away the right of hearing which is granted to defendant under S. 9(5)(a). Held Order of Collector refusing to condone delay was not liable to interference under Article 199.


For more visit:


https://runkit.com/aleygill324/suit-for-dissolution-of-marriage-in-pakistan-advocate-nazia
https://www.reddit.com/user/ammyjohn87/comments/ewmscc/best_lawyer_to_do_constitutional_petition_for/

https://runkit.com/aleygill324/get-best-lawyer-consultancy-about-maintenance-of-wife-in-pakistan
https://murmur.csail.mit.edu/thread?group_name=Suit-with-legal-law&tid=12460
https://canvas.elsevier.com/eportfolios/8531/Legal_Law_For_Dissolution_of_Marriage_in_Pakistan/Legal_Law_For_Dissolution_of_Marriage_in_Pakistan
https://runkit.com/aleygill324/how-to-solve-suit-of-declaration-in-pakistan